Exchange 2007 "MC Donalds style".
Hello and thanks for welcoming me to your community. I am working on a new architecture for exchange 2007 and I would like it to be the final architecture for our business. The goal to this architecture is to get X amount of users per box, and more importantly X amount of users per disk. The configuration i am looking at is Raid 10, 4+4 on 15k disk for VIP users (Blackberry) databases, and Raid 1, 1+1 on 15k disk for the logs. I was figuring about 675 blackberry Users on the CCR running on 2 DB arrays, and 2 Logs arrays (1 per server). The second configuration I am looking at is Raid 5, 7+1 on 15k disk for normal users databases and raid 1, 1+1 on 15k disk for the logs. I figured about 1400 users on 2 raid 5 arrays in shared mode (Using 30% of the array) and 1 raid 1 array for the logs. Then, just multiply by the users and it would give out a pre made solution. If you have any reference to something like this being done it would be great also. Thanks for your help. D
November 18th, 2008 12:29am

Hello Mr D, I would rather use storage calculator to get the count and yes don't forgot to count mail items retention period which is 14 days by default which requires 30% of extra space of your DB, 10% for whitespace & 5% for indexing. Exchange 2007 Mailbox Server Role Storage Requirements Calculator http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/01/15/432207.aspx Exchange 2007 Mailbox Server Role Storage Requirements Calculator updated to v 16.0http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/09/23/449899.aspx Note: It is recommended to control total edb filesize at 100GB for stand-anon DB and 200GB if CCR/LCR enabled.
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
November 18th, 2008 11:43am

Hi. Thanks for your suggestion. I did use the calculator and have a farely good idea of what the requirements are. My idea is to roll out generic solutions to my clients and avoid having to re architecture everything every time. I am wondering if someone has done this.
November 19th, 2008 5:30pm

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other recent topics Other recent topics